JobOS Pro vs
QuoteIQ
QuoteIQ is good at what it is built for. Self-quoting forms, satellite measurement and fast estimates are genuinely useful, and the price is hard to argue with. The question is whether a quoting-first tool built across fifty-plus trades is the right centre of gravity for a multi-crew HVAC, plumbing or electrical shop.
30-day free trial · No credit card required · Cancel anytime
Kate AI missed call recovery
- Missed call
- Kate answers in 47 seconds
- Lead created
- Job booked
- $350 recovered
What it is built around
The quote
Where its users come from
Pressure washing, lawn care, window cleaning
What a trade shop also needs
Dispatch, agreements, margin, locations
The 30-second answer
We would rather lose a bad-fit deal on the demo than in month three. Here is the honest split.
Stay on QuoteIQ if
- Your business is quote-driven and the estimate is the moment that decides the sale.
- Customer self-quoting from your website is a real lever for you.
- You are one to three people and price is the binding constraint.
- Dispatch is simple enough that a basic calendar covers it.
Move to JobOS Pro if
- You run multiple crews and dispatch is the thing that actually breaks.
- Maintenance agreements and recurring service are a meaningful share of revenue.
- You need margin by job, by technician and by lead source, not just quote conversion.
- You are running or planning more than one location.
Run it on your own numbers
Not a marketing chart. Move the inputs to match your business and read the bottom line.
Annual cost comparison
Illustrative estimate · based on the figures you enterQuoteIQ is priced in flat tiers rather than per seat, so seat math is not the comparison. The comparison is what you end up paying around a quoting-first tool once a multi-crew shop needs dispatch depth, an answering service, reputation and lead generation. Tick what you are buying separately today.
QuoteIQ and JobOS Pro, line by line
Sixteen decisions that change what a month actually looks like in your business.
| QuoteIQ | JobOS Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Built around | Quoting and estimating first | The full revenue path: intake, dispatch, delivery, money, intelligence |
| Core trades served | 50+ trades, weighted to pressure washing, lawn care and cleaning | HVAC, plumbing, electrical and adjacent trades |
| Pricing model | Flat tiers, with user caps on lower tiers | Flat monthly by tier. Unlimited technicians and office staff on every tier |
| Free trial | 14 days, credit or debit card required | 30 days, no credit card |
| Customer self-quoting | Strong. A genuine differentiator | Estimates with dynamic pricing and financing presented in the estimate |
| AI phone answering | Available | Kate answers, qualifies, books into live availability and confirms by text |
| What happens after the AI answers | A lead and a notification | A booked job on the dispatch board, an invoice, a review request and attribution to source |
| Dispatch and scheduling | Drag-and-drop calendar with routing | Dispatch board, routing, utilisation and fleet intelligence |
| Maintenance agreements and recurring service | Basic recurring jobs | Recurring jobs, service agreements and subscription billing |
| Technician field app | Mobile app for jobs and payment | GPS, before and after photos, signature, payment, offline mode |
| Inventory and parts | Limited | Inventory and parts tracking included |
| Payroll and operational finance | Not included | Included |
| Owner-level intelligence | Quote and revenue reporting | CEO dashboard, daily briefing, Operational Health Score, margin by job, tech and source |
| Multi-location and franchise | Not the focus | Multi-location dashboard, network leakage ranking, benchmarking, royalty tracking, white-label |
| Best fit | Solo and small quote-driven operators | 3 to 15 trucks, growing, and multi-location networks |
| Migration required to start | Not applicable | None. Runs alongside your current tools |
Every row is a question worth asking on your own demo.
The number this page is really about
Every comparison in this category argues about features. Here is the arithmetic that decides whether any of it matters. Substitute your own figures. The shape of the answer does not change.
That is one call a day. Most multi-crew shops miss considerably more during a July heat wave or a January freeze, which are precisely the weeks the tickets are largest. The estimate that goes cold sits on top of it, and the completed job invoiced eleven days late sits on top of that.
Against that number, the difference between two software subscriptions is a rounding error. The only question worth arguing about is which system recovers it.
Where QuoteIQ genuinely beats us
This one deserves a straight answer, because on several points they are ahead and pretending otherwise would insult your judgement.
Price, by a wide margin
Their entry plan is a fraction of ours and that is not a trick. If you are a solo operator whose main problem is sending estimates faster, we are more platform than you need and we will say so on the call.
Customer self-quoting
Letting a homeowner build their own quote on your website at midnight is a real advantage, and very few platforms do it properly. If that is central to how you sell, weigh it heavily.
Review volume and community
Thousands of reviews, a high rating and an active user community. We are one year in with nothing comparable. That is a real gap and it should count against us in your decision.
Where JobOS Pro wins
Five differences that show up in revenue, not in a feature checklist.
The quote is one moment. The leak runs the whole length of the job.
Quoting-first software optimises the moment the price is presented, and it optimises it well. But map where money actually escapes a multi-crew trade shop and the quote is one point on a long line. The call nobody answered. The estimate that went cold three days later. The job dispatched to the wrong tech who needed a second truck roll. The completed job invoiced eleven days late. The happy customer who never left a review, so next month's lead flow is thinner.
JobOS Pro is built around the whole line rather than one point on it. That is not a criticism of a quoting tool doing its job. It is a statement about which problem is bigger once you have four crews in the field and a phone that rings faster than one person can answer it.
An AI that answers is not the same as an AI wired into the business
AI phone answering is becoming table stakes, and QuoteIQ having it is a fair point in their favour. The question that separates implementations is what happens in the ninety seconds after the AI hangs up.
When Kate answers, the job lands on the dispatch board against live availability, the customer gets a confirmation text, the estimate carries financing, the invoice fires on completion, the review request goes out automatically, and the whole chain is attributed back to the lead source that produced the call. An AI that creates a lead has recovered a name. An AI wired into dispatch, invoicing and reputation has recovered revenue. Those are different products.
Built for the trade, not for fifty trades
Covering fifty-plus industries is a growth strategy and it works, but it has a cost: the product has to stay general enough to serve a lawn care route and a chimney sweep and a detailer. Nothing in it can assume a load calculation, a maintenance agreement renewal, a permit, a refrigerant log or a two-tech install day.
JobOS Pro assumes all of it. The pricebook, the agreement lifecycle, the multi-tech job, the parts on the van, the seasonal demand curve of a heat wave. Depth in one vertical beats breadth across fifty when the vertical is the one you actually work in.
Reviews from a different business than yours
A high rating across thousands of reviews is meaningful, and it is worth checking who wrote them. When the review base is weighted toward pressure washing, lawn care and window cleaning, those operators are rating a product against a one-person, one-visit, one-quote business model.
That is a real business and the software clearly serves it. It is not a four-crew HVAC shop in July with three emergency calls stacked, a maintenance renewal due, a parts shortage on one van and a tech who needs rerouting. Read the reviews, and read who is writing them.
There is nowhere to grow into
The hardest cost in software is not the subscription, it is the migration you do every time you outgrow a tool. Choosing for today guarantees you pay that cost again, and it gets more expensive with every truck, every year of history and every workaround your team has built around the gaps.
JobOS Pro runs a single truck and a fifty-location franchise network on the same architecture. You change tiers, not systems. If growth, a second location or franchising is anywhere in your five-year plan, that is the difference that compounds.
What leaving QuoteIQ actually looks like
Most shops stay on software they have outgrown because of the switch, not the software. So the move happens in parallel, with no cutover weekend and nothing frozen during busy season.
- 01
A 20-minute call with your own numbers
Your technician count, your average ticket, last month's call log and your current invoice. We run the comparison in front of you. If the answer is that you should stay on QuoteIQ, we say so on the call rather than three weeks into an onboarding.
- 02
Turn on the front door, change nothing else
Forward your overflow and after-hours calls to Kate. That is a phone-number forward and a scripting session, live in a day or two. QuoteIQ keeps running exactly as it does today. Nothing is at risk and nothing is deleted.
- 03
Watch two weeks of recovered revenue
Every call Kate answers is transcribed, every booking lands on the calendar, every recovered job is attributed. You get a number rather than a promise, and that number either justifies the next step or it does not.
- 04
Migrate when you are ready, not before
Customers, job history, pricebook, open invoices and recurring agreements, moved by our team rather than handed to you as a CSV template. You keep your QuoteIQ export. Both systems stay live through the transition.
- 05
Consolidate the stack and cancel the extras
The answering service, the review tool, the separate marketing vendor, one at a time, as each is replaced. This is where the monthly saving becomes obvious, and where the reporting finally starts telling you the truth about margin.
Proof, in the operator's own words
This is the section that closes the deal, and the one thing we cannot write for you.
Build note: replace before publishing. Drop three items here: a named customer quote with shop name, city and truck count; a before-and-after number on recovered calls or booked revenue; and a short migration story from a shop that left QuoteIQ. Until real proof sits here, this page asks a skeptical owner to trust a one-year-old vendor on assertion alone, which is the single largest conversion constraint on the funnel. A screen recording of Kate handling a live inbound call is the highest-leverage asset to produce first.
The objections we hear on every QuoteIQ call
Answered plainly, including the ones that do not flatter us.
They have an AI phone agent too. What is different?▾
They are much cheaper. Justify the difference.▾
I am a solo operator. Should I use them instead?▾
Can I keep QuoteIQ and add Kate?▾
Do you have customer self-quoting?▾
What about my existing quotes and customer list?▾
Do you handle maintenance agreements?▾
How do the trials compare?▾
Do you support multiple locations?▾
Cheaper is the right answer for some shops. Find out if yours is one.
Bring last month's call log and your average ticket. We will show you what the phone is costing you, what Kate would have booked, and whether that number justifies the difference in price. If it does not, we will say so.
30-day free trial · No credit card required · Cancel anytime